LATEST Ancient Prototypes of Proxy Warfare: The Economic and Logistical Burden of Roman and Persian Proxy Networks among Arab Tribes and Caucasian Powers
SEARCH
DB ONLINE
EN ▾
EN TR
LCU 1700
Photo: Wikimedia Commons · Public domain
REC // INTEL FEED

LCU1700

Landing Craft (LCAC, LCM) · United States
ADD TO COMPARE

LCU1700

LCU 1700
LCU 1700 Photo: Wikimedia Commons · Public domain
MASS (Military Archive Scoring System) 66
* Absolute score — assessed within category · no era adjustment
Payload
75
Speed
60
Beach Access
90
Range
55
Versatility
65
Reliability
70
Survivability
50
Sea-State Capability
40
Technology
55
Cost-Effectiveness
80
Methodology ↗ → Landing Craft (LCAC, LCM) ranking
Origin United States
ManufacturerAustal USA
CategoryLanding Craft (LCAC, LCM)
Operators1 countries
⬇ Overview
⚙ Specs
⊕ History
⊕ Operators
⚖ MASS Score
📚 Sources
Data Quality81%
MASS(Military Archive Scoring System)
⊟ Landing Craft (LCAC, LCM)ranking ↗methodology ↗
66
Landing Craft (LCAC, LCM) MASS Rating
12/68
All-Time
Landing Craft (LCAC, LCM) · 10 axes scored
Payload
75
Speed
60
Beach Access
90
Range
55
Versatility
65
Reliability
70
Survivability
50
Sea-State Capability
40
Technology
55
Cost-Effectiveness
80
ⓘ Regardless of era, the same scoring system applies to all units in the landing craft (lcac, lcm) category.
01 / Overview
LCU 1700
Category
Landing Craft (LCAC, LCM)
Country
United States
Prime contractor
Austal USA
Operators
1 countries
💰 PERFORMANCE / PRICE ASSESSMENT Methodology ↗
LANDING CRAFT (LCAC, LCM)
—
PERFORMANCE/PRICE
71
UNIT COST (2025 USD)
—
MASS SCORE ↗
66
landing craft (lcac, lcm) category
ⓘ Performance/Price and MASS score are computed across all units in the landing craft (lcac, lcm) category, regardless of era.
02 / Specs & Design
03 / History
04 / Operators
Operator Countries1country
United StatesACTIVE
Landing Craft (LCAC, LCM) United States Austal USA
📚 Sources
📖 ENCYCLOPEDIA Browse the Landing Craft (LCAC, LCM) entry →