Photo: Basher Eyre · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 2.0

REC // INTEL FEED

Link16

Encrypted Comms Systems · United States

ADD TO COMPARE

Link16

Link 16 Photo: Basher Eyre · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 2.0

MASS (Military Archive Scoring System) 91

* Absolute score — assessed within category · no era adjustment

Encryption Strength

Interoperability

100

Data Capacity

Low Latency

Key Management

Reliability

Versatility

Exploitation Resistance

Technology

Cost-Effectiveness

Methodology ↗ → Encrypted Comms Systems ranking

Origin

United States

CategoryEncrypted Comms Systems

⊕ History

Data Quality80%

MASS(Military Archive Scoring System)

⊟ Encrypted Comms Systemsranking ↗methodology ↗

Encrypted Comms Systems MASS Rating

1/2

All-Time

Encrypted Comms Systems · 10 axes scored

Encryption Strength

Interoperability

100

Data Capacity

Low Latency

Key Management

Reliability

Versatility

Exploitation Resistance

Technology

Cost-Effectiveness

ⓘ Regardless of era, the same scoring system applies to all units in the encrypted comms systems category.

01 / Overview

Link 16

Category

Encrypted Comms Systems

Country

United States

💰 PERFORMANCE / PRICE ASSESSMENT Methodology ↗

ENCRYPTED COMMS SYSTEMS

—

PERFORMANCE/PRICE

UNIT COST (2025 USD)

—

MASS SCORE ↗

encrypted comms systems category

ⓘ Performance/Price and MASS score are computed across all units in the encrypted comms systems category, regardless of era.

02 / Specs & Design

03 / History

04 / MASS Score

ENCRYPTED COMMS SYSTEMS RANKING Encrypted Comms Systems

Link 16 (this weapon) 91 #2

KY-57 VINSON 73

MASS RANKINGSMASS ↗

1ENCRYPTED COMMS SYSTEMS 19UNITED STATES · ALL WEAPONS 1PERFORMANCE/PRICE · ENCRYPTED COMMS SYSTEMS

ⓘ Rankings are within theEncrypted Comms Systemscategory.

Encrypted Comms Systems United States

📚 Sources

📖 ENCYCLOPEDIA Browse the Encrypted Comms Systems entry →