Photo: Esquilo · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 3.0

REC // INTEL FEED

MON-50

Claymore-Type Mines · Russia

ADD TO COMPARE

MON-50

MON-50 Photo: Esquilo · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 3.0

MASS (Military Archive Scoring System) 83

* Absolute score — assessed within category · no era adjustment

Lethality

Directional Coverage

Effective Range

Fragment Density

Command Detonation

Portability

Reliability

Ease of Use

Versatility

Cost

Methodology ↗ → Claymore-Type Mines ranking

Origin

Russia

ManufacturerSoviet Union

CategoryClaymore-Type Mines

Operators1 countries

⊕ History

Data Quality81%

MASS(Military Archive Scoring System)

⊟ Claymore-Type Minesranking ↗methodology ↗

Claymore-Type Mines MASS Rating

1/3

All-Time

Claymore-Type Mines · 10 axes scored

Lethality

Directional Coverage

Effective Range

Fragment Density

Command Detonation

Portability

Reliability

Ease of Use

Versatility

Cost

ⓘ Regardless of era, the same scoring system applies to all units in the claymore-type mines category.

01 / Overview

MON-50

Category

Country

Prime contractor

Operators

💰 PERFORMANCE / PRICE ASSESSMENT Methodology ↗

CLAYMORE-TYPE MINES

—

PERFORMANCE/PRICE

UNIT COST (2025 USD)

—

MASS SCORE ↗

claymore-type mines category

ⓘ Performance/Price and MASS score are computed across all units in the claymore-type mines category, regardless of era.

02 / Specs & Design

03 / History

04 / Operators

Operator Countries1country

RussiaACTIVE

05 / MASS Score

CLAYMORE-TYPE MINES RANKING Claymore-Type Mines

MON-50 (this weapon) 83 #2 Type 66 directional mine 82 #3

MON-100 78

MASS RANKINGSMASS ↗

1CLAYMORE-TYPE MINES 46RUSSIA · ALL WEAPONS 1PERFORMANCE/PRICE · CLAYMORE-TYPE MINES

ⓘ Rankings are within theClaymore-Type Minescategory.

📚 Sources

📖 ENCYCLOPEDIA Browse the Claymore-Type Mines entry →