LATEST Ancient Prototypes of Proxy Warfare: The Economic and Logistical Burden of Roman and Persian Proxy Networks among Arab Tribes and Caucasian Powers
SEARCH
DB ONLINE
EN ▾
EN TR
Oozel
Photo: ell brown · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY 2.0
REC // INTEL FEED

Oozel

IFF Systems
ADD TO COMPARE

Oozel

Oozel
Oozel Photo: ell brown · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY 2.0
MASS (Military Archive Scoring System) 65
* Absolute score — assessed within category · no era adjustment
Identification Accuracy
65
Range
55
Mode / Standard Coverage
70
Crypto Security
60
Reliability
80
Interoperability
75
Spoof Resistance
50
Integration
70
Technology
65
Cost-Effectiveness
85
Methodology ↗ → IFF Systems ranking
ManufacturerSoviet Union
CategoryIFF Systems
⬇ Overview
⚙ Specs
⊕ History
⚖ MASS Score
📚 Sources
Data Quality80%
MASS(Military Archive Scoring System)
⊟ IFF Systemsranking ↗methodology ↗
65
IFF Systems MASS Rating
2/3
All-Time
IFF Systems · 10 axes scored
Identification Accuracy
65
Range
55
Mode / Standard Coverage
70
Crypto Security
60
Reliability
80
Interoperability
75
Spoof Resistance
50
Integration
70
Technology
65
Cost-Effectiveness
85
ⓘ Regardless of era, the same scoring system applies to all units in the iff systems category.
01 / Overview
Oozel
Category
IFF Systems
Prime contractor
Soviet Union
💰 PERFORMANCE / PRICE ASSESSMENT Methodology ↗
IFF SYSTEMS
—
PERFORMANCE/PRICE
88
UNIT COST (2025 USD)
—
MASS SCORE ↗
65
iff systems category
ⓘ Performance/Price and MASS score are computed across all units in the iff systems category, regardless of era.
02 / Specs & Design
03 / History
04 / MASS Score
IFF SYSTEMS RANKING IFF Systems
#1 US AN/APX-100 84 #2 Oozel (this weapon) 65 #3 RU Kremniy-2M 56
MASS RANKINGSMASS ↗
2IFF SYSTEMS1PERFORMANCE/PRICE · IFF SYSTEMS
ⓘ Rankings are within theIFF Systemscategory.
IFF Systems Soviet Union
📚 Sources
📖 ENCYCLOPEDIA Browse the IFF Systems entry →