LATEST Ancient Prototypes of Proxy Warfare: The Economic and Logistical Burden of Roman and Persian Proxy Networks among Arab Tribes and Caucasian Powers
SEARCH
DB ONLINE
EN ▾
EN TR
QB-17 Flying Fortress
Photo: United States Army Air Forces · Wikimedia Commons · Public domain
REC // INTEL FEED

QB-17FlyingFortress

Strategic Bombers
ADD TO COMPARE

QB-17FlyingFortress

⚙ Boeing B-17G Flying Fortress variant
QB-17 Flying Fortress
QB-17 Flying Fortress Photo: United States Army Air Forces · Wikimedia Commons · Public domain
MASS (Military Archive Scoring System) 66
* Absolute score — assessed within category · no era adjustment
Payload
85
Range
80
Penetration / Survivability
60
Nuclear Capability
70
Stand-Off Capability
50
Avionics
40
Stealth
0
Reliability
75
Strategic Impact
90
Cost-Effectiveness
65
Methodology ↗ → Strategic Bombers ranking
ManufacturerBoeing
CategoryStrategic Bombers
⬇ Overview
⚙ Specs
⊕ History
⚖ MASS Score
📚 Sources
Data Quality80%
MASS(Military Archive Scoring System)
⊟ Strategic Bombersranking ↗methodology ↗
66
Strategic Bombers MASS Rating
41/163
All-Time
Strategic Bombers · 10 axes scored
Payload
85
Range
80
Penetration / Survivability
60
Nuclear Capability
70
Stand-Off Capability
50
Avionics
40
Stealth
0
Reliability
75
Strategic Impact
90
Cost-Effectiveness
65
ⓘ Regardless of era, the same scoring system applies to all units in the strategic bombers category.
01 / Overview
QB-17 Flying Fortress
Category
Strategic Bombers
Prime contractor
Boeing
💰 PERFORMANCE / PRICE ASSESSMENT Methodology ↗
STRATEGIC BOMBERS
—
PERFORMANCE/PRICE
75
UNIT COST (2025 USD)
—
MASS SCORE ↗
66
strategic bombers category
ⓘ Performance/Price and MASS score are computed across all units in the strategic bombers category, regardless of era.
02 / Specs & Design
03 / History
Strategic Bombers Boeing variant
📚 Sources
📖 ENCYCLOPEDIA Browse the Strategic Bombers entry →