LATEST Ancient Prototypes of Proxy Warfare: The Economic and Logistical Burden of Roman and Persian Proxy Networks among Arab Tribes and Caucasian Powers
SEARCH
DB ONLINE
EN ▾
A.P. Mine E.P. No. 4
Photo: Robert M. Lavinsky · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 3.0
REC // INTEL FEED

A.P.MineE.P.No.4

Anti-Personnel Mines · United Kingdom
ADD TO COMPARE

A.P.MineE.P.No.4

A.P. Mine E.P. No. 4
A.P. Mine E.P. No. 4 Photo: Robert M. Lavinsky · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 3.0
* Absolute score — assessed within category · no era adjustment
Lethality
60
Concealment
85
Trigger Sensitivity
75
Anti-Handling
30
Reliability
80
Safety / Self-Destruct
50
Ease of Deployment
90
Detection Resistance
85
Area Coverage
70
Cost
95
Origin United Kingdom
CategoryAnti-Personnel Mines
Operators6 countries
Data Quality85%
MASS(Military Archive Scoring System)
71
Anti-Personnel Mines MASS Rating
23/45
All-Time
Anti-Personnel Mines · 10 axes scored
Lethality
60
Concealment
85
Trigger Sensitivity
75
Anti-Handling
30
Reliability
80
Safety / Self-Destruct
50
Ease of Deployment
90
Detection Resistance
85
Area Coverage
70
Cost
95
ⓘ Regardless of era, the same scoring system applies to all units in the anti-personnel mines category.
01 / Overview
A.P. Mine E.P. No. 4
💰 PERFORMANCE / PRICE ASSESSMENT Methodology ↗
ANTI-PERSONNEL MINES
—
PERFORMANCE/PRICE
40
UNIT COST (2025 USD)
—
71
anti-personnel mines category
ⓘ Performance/Price and MASS score are computed across all units in the anti-personnel mines category, regardless of era.
02 / Specs & Design
◎General2MOD.2
  • Munition Typebounding anti-personnel mine
  • In ServiceNo
◈Trigger & Fuzing3MOD.3
▣Effect4MOD.4
◇Deployment3MOD.3
03 / History
04 / Operators
📖 TERMS ON THIS PAGE2terms
A capability or feature explicitly prohibited by international treaties such as the Ottawa Treaty or CCW Amended Protocol II.
These terms are listed automatically because they appear on this page.full encyclopedia →
📚 Sources
📖 ENCYCLOPEDIA Browse the Anti-Personnel Mines entry →