Data Quality85%
MASS(Military Archive Scoring System)
ⓘ Regardless of era, the same scoring system applies to all units in the anti-personnel mines category.
01 / Overview
Glasmine 43
💰 PERFORMANCE / PRICE ASSESSMENT Methodology ↗
ANTI-PERSONNEL MINES · WORLD WAR II
6
PERFORMANCE/PRICE
65
UNIT COST (2025 USD)
—
ⓘ Performance/Price and MASS score are computed across all units in the anti-personnel mines category, regardless of era.
02 / Specs & Design
◎General5MOD.5
- Munition TypeAnti-personnel mine
- Service Entry Year1944
- Weight1.814 kg
- Diameter114.3 mm
- In ServiceYes
◈Trigger & Fuzing5MOD.5
- Trigger TypePressure
- Activation MethodMechanical or chemical
- Anti-Handling DeviceNo
- Command-DetonatedNo
- Self-Destruct / DeactivationNo
▣Effect5MOD.5
- Warhead TypeBlast
- Explosive Weight0.2 kg
- Explosive TypeTNT
- DirectionalNo
- BoundingNo
◇Deployment4MOD.4
- Deployment MethodManual placement
- ScatterableNo
- Detection DifficultyHigh due to glass construction
- Treaty-Banned (Ottawa/CCW)Yes
◆Production1MOD.1
- Total Production11
03 / History
SERVICE LIFESPANRetired
- 1939First deployment: World War II
- 1944Production started
- 1945Production ended
82
years in service
1
years in production
11
units produced
0
countries operating
ⓘ 1 countries retired it.
05 / MASS Score
ANTI-PERSONNEL MINES RANKING Anti-Personnel Mines · World War II
MASS RANKINGSMASS ↗
45ANTI-PERSONNEL MINES6WORLD WAR II · ANTI-PERSONNEL MINES683GERMANY · ALL WEAPONS11PERFORMANCE/PRICE · ANTI-PERSONNEL MINES
ⓘ Rankings are within theAnti-Personnel Minescategory.
📖 TERMS ON THIS PAGE1terms
A capability or feature explicitly prohibited by international treaties such as the Ottawa Treaty or CCW Amended Protocol II.
These terms are listed automatically because they appear on this page.full encyclopedia →
📚 Sources