LATEST Ancient Prototypes of Proxy Warfare: The Economic and Logistical Burden of Roman and Persian Proxy Networks among Arab Tribes and Caucasian Powers
SEARCH
DB ONLINE
EN ▾
EN TR
AN/AVQ-26 Pave Tack
Photo: Greg Goebel · Wikimedia Commons · Public domain
REC // INTEL FEED

AN/AVQ-26PaveTack

Targeting Pods
ADD TO COMPARE

AN/AVQ-26PaveTack

AN/AVQ-26 Pave Tack
AN/AVQ-26 Pave Tack Photo: Greg Goebel · Wikimedia Commons · Public domain
MASS (Military Archive Scoring System) 59
* Absolute score — assessed within category · no era adjustment
Detection / ID Range
55
Targeting Accuracy
60
Sensor Resolution
58
Day / Night Capability
70
Data-Link
45
Reliability
68
Integration Versatility
62
Low Weight / Drag
50
Technology
57
Cost-Effectiveness
65
Methodology ↗ → Targeting Pods ranking
ManufacturerFord Aerospace
CategoryTargeting Pods
⬇ Overview
⚙ Specs
⊕ History
⚖ MASS Score
📚 Sources
Data Quality80%
MASS(Military Archive Scoring System)
⊟ Targeting Podsranking ↗methodology ↗
59
Targeting Pods MASS Rating
3/5
All-Time
Targeting Pods · 10 axes scored
Detection / ID Range
55
Targeting Accuracy
60
Sensor Resolution
58
Day / Night Capability
70
Data-Link
45
Reliability
68
Integration Versatility
62
Low Weight / Drag
50
Technology
57
Cost-Effectiveness
65
ⓘ Regardless of era, the same scoring system applies to all units in the targeting pods category.
01 / Overview
AN/AVQ-26 Pave Tack
Category
Targeting Pods
Prime contractor
Ford Aerospace
💰 PERFORMANCE / PRICE ASSESSMENT Methodology ↗
TARGETING PODS
—
PERFORMANCE/PRICE
72
UNIT COST (2025 USD)
—
MASS SCORE ↗
59
targeting pods category
ⓘ Performance/Price and MASS score are computed across all units in the targeting pods category, regardless of era.
02 / Specs & Design
03 / History
Targeting Pods Ford Aerospace
📚 Sources
📖 ENCYCLOPEDIA Browse the Targeting Pods entry →