LATEST Ancient Prototypes of Proxy Warfare: The Economic and Logistical Burden of Roman and Persian Proxy Networks among Arab Tribes and Caucasian Powers
SEARCH
DB ONLINE
EN ▾
EN TR
CLDP
Photo: Unknown author · Wikimedia Commons · Public domain
REC // INTEL FEED

CLDP

Targeting Pods
ADD TO COMPARE

CLDP

CLDP
CLDP Photo: Unknown author · Wikimedia Commons · Public domain
MASS (Military Archive Scoring System) 54
* Absolute score — assessed within category · no era adjustment
Detection / ID Range
40
Targeting Accuracy
50
Sensor Resolution
45
Day / Night Capability
55
Data-Link
40
Reliability
70
Integration Versatility
75
Low Weight / Drag
80
Technology
60
Cost-Effectiveness
70
Methodology ↗ → Targeting Pods ranking
ManufacturerThales Group
CategoryTargeting Pods
⬇ Overview
⚙ Specs
⊕ History
⚖ MASS Score
📚 Sources
Data Quality80%
MASS(Military Archive Scoring System)
⊟ Targeting Podsranking ↗methodology ↗
54
Targeting Pods MASS Rating
4/5
All-Time
Targeting Pods · 10 axes scored
Detection / ID Range
40
Targeting Accuracy
50
Sensor Resolution
45
Day / Night Capability
55
Data-Link
40
Reliability
70
Integration Versatility
75
Low Weight / Drag
80
Technology
60
Cost-Effectiveness
70
ⓘ Regardless of era, the same scoring system applies to all units in the targeting pods category.
01 / Overview
CLDP
Category
Targeting Pods
Prime contractor
Thales Group
💰 PERFORMANCE / PRICE ASSESSMENT Methodology ↗
TARGETING PODS
—
PERFORMANCE/PRICE
78
UNIT COST (2025 USD)
—
MASS SCORE ↗
54
targeting pods category
ⓘ Performance/Price and MASS score are computed across all units in the targeting pods category, regardless of era.
02 / Specs & Design
03 / History
04 / MASS Score
TARGETING PODS RANKING Targeting Pods
#2 US AN/ASQ-228 ATFLIR 76 #3 AN/AVQ-26 Pave Tack 59 #4 CLDP (this weapon) 54 #5 US AN/AVQ-23 Pave Spike 34
MASS RANKINGSMASS ↗
4TARGETING PODS2PERFORMANCE/PRICE · TARGETING PODS
ⓘ Rankings are within theTargeting Podscategory.
Targeting Pods Thales Group
📚 Sources
📖 ENCYCLOPEDIA Browse the Targeting Pods entry →