LATEST Ancient Prototypes of Proxy Warfare: The Economic and Logistical Burden of Roman and Persian Proxy Networks among Arab Tribes and Caucasian Powers
SEARCH
DB ONLINE
EN ▾
EN TR
REC // INTEL FEED

BCMMod0Compensator

Muzzle Devices · United States
ADD TO COMPARE

BCMMod0Compensator

MASS (Military Archive Scoring System) 69
* Absolute score — assessed within category · no era adjustment
Recoil Reduction
65
Flash Suppression
50
Muzzle-Rise Control
70
Durability
85
Low Concussion
40
Suppressor Compatibility
75
Weight
80
Versatility
60
Build Quality
90
Cost-Effectiveness
85
Methodology ↗ → Muzzle Devices ranking
Origin United States
ManufacturerBravo Company
CategoryMuzzle Devices
⬇ Overview
⚙ Specs
⊕ History
⚖ MASS Score
📚 Sources
Data Quality80%
MASS(Military Archive Scoring System)
⊟ Muzzle Devicesranking ↗methodology ↗
69
Muzzle Devices MASS Rating
7/7
All-Time
Muzzle Devices · 10 axes scored
Recoil Reduction
65
Flash Suppression
50
Muzzle-Rise Control
70
Durability
85
Low Concussion
40
Suppressor Compatibility
75
Weight
80
Versatility
60
Build Quality
90
Cost-Effectiveness
85
ⓘ Regardless of era, the same scoring system applies to all units in the muzzle devices category.
01 / Overview
BCM Mod 0 Compensator
Category
Muzzle Devices
Country
United States
Prime contractor
Bravo Company
💰 PERFORMANCE / PRICE ASSESSMENT Methodology ↗
MUZZLE DEVICES
—
PERFORMANCE/PRICE
88
UNIT COST (2025 USD)
—
MASS SCORE ↗
69
muzzle devices category
ⓘ Performance/Price and MASS score are computed across all units in the muzzle devices category, regardless of era.
02 / Specs & Design
03 / History
Muzzle Devices United States Bravo Company
📚 Sources
📖 ENCYCLOPEDIA Browse the Muzzle Devices entry →