LATEST Ancient Prototypes of Proxy Warfare: The Economic and Logistical Burden of Roman and Persian Proxy Networks among Arab Tribes and Caucasian Powers
SEARCH
DB ONLINE
EN ▾
EN TR
REC // INTEL FEED

JPEnterprisesTacticalCompensator

Muzzle Devices · United States
ADD TO COMPARE

JPEnterprisesTacticalCompensator

MASS (Military Archive Scoring System) 79
* Absolute score — assessed within category · no era adjustment
Recoil Reduction
75
Flash Suppression
60
Muzzle-Rise Control
85
Durability
90
Low Concussion
70
Suppressor Compatibility
80
Weight
85
Versatility
75
Build Quality
95
Cost-Effectiveness
80
Methodology ↗ → Muzzle Devices ranking
Origin United States
ManufacturerJP Enterprises
CategoryMuzzle Devices
⬇ Overview
⚙ Specs
⊕ History
⚖ MASS Score
📚 Sources
Data Quality80%
MASS(Military Archive Scoring System)
⊟ Muzzle Devicesranking ↗methodology ↗
79
Muzzle Devices MASS Rating
6/7
All-Time
Muzzle Devices · 10 axes scored
Recoil Reduction
75
Flash Suppression
60
Muzzle-Rise Control
85
Durability
90
Low Concussion
70
Suppressor Compatibility
80
Weight
85
Versatility
75
Build Quality
95
Cost-Effectiveness
80
ⓘ Regardless of era, the same scoring system applies to all units in the muzzle devices category.
01 / Overview
JP Enterprises Tactical Compensator
Category
Muzzle Devices
Country
United States
Prime contractor
JP Enterprises
💰 PERFORMANCE / PRICE ASSESSMENT Methodology ↗
MUZZLE DEVICES
—
PERFORMANCE/PRICE
88
UNIT COST (2025 USD)
—
MASS SCORE ↗
79
muzzle devices category
ⓘ Performance/Price and MASS score are computed across all units in the muzzle devices category, regardless of era.
02 / Specs & Design
03 / History
Muzzle Devices United States JP Enterprises
📚 Sources
📖 ENCYCLOPEDIA Browse the Muzzle Devices entry →