LATEST Ancient Prototypes of Proxy Warfare: The Economic and Logistical Burden of Roman and Persian Proxy Networks among Arab Tribes and Caucasian Powers
SEARCH
DB ONLINE
EN ▾
EN TR
F-16A Block 10 Fighting Falcon
Photo: http://www.f-16.net/gallery_item97839.html · Wikimedia Commons · Public domain
REC // INTEL FEED

F-16ABlock10FightingFalcon

Interceptors
ADD TO COMPARE

F-16ABlock10FightingFalcon

F-16A Block 10 Fighting Falcon
F-16A Block 10 Fighting Falcon Photo: http://www.f-16.net/gallery_item97839.html · Wikimedia Commons · Public domain
MASS (Military Archive Scoring System) 71
* Absolute score — assessed within category · no era adjustment
Speed
80
Rate of Climb
75
Service Ceiling
70
Radar & Sensors
60
Long-Range Missiles
55
Range
65
Readiness
85
Reliability
80
Technology
60
Cost-Effectiveness
85
Methodology ↗ → Interceptors ranking
ManufacturerGeneral Dynamics, Fokker, SABCA
CategoryInterceptors
⬇ Overview
⚙ Specs
⊕ History
⚖ MASS Score
📚 Sources
Data Quality80%
MASS(Military Archive Scoring System)
⊟ Interceptorsranking ↗methodology ↗
71
Interceptors MASS Rating
27/87
All-Time
Interceptors · 10 axes scored
Speed
80
Rate of Climb
75
Service Ceiling
70
Radar & Sensors
60
Long-Range Missiles
55
Range
65
Readiness
85
Reliability
80
Technology
60
Cost-Effectiveness
85
ⓘ Regardless of era, the same scoring system applies to all units in the interceptors category.
01 / Overview
F-16A Block 10 Fighting Falcon
Category
Interceptors
Prime contractor
General Dynamics, Fokker, SABCA
💰 PERFORMANCE / PRICE ASSESSMENT Methodology ↗
INTERCEPTORS
—
PERFORMANCE/PRICE
90
UNIT COST (2025 USD)
—
MASS SCORE ↗
71
interceptors category
ⓘ Performance/Price and MASS score are computed across all units in the interceptors category, regardless of era.
02 / Specs & Design
03 / History
Interceptors General DynamicsFokkerSABCA
📚 Sources
📖 ENCYCLOPEDIA Browse the Interceptors entry →