LATEST Ancient Prototypes of Proxy Warfare: The Economic and Logistical Burden of Roman and Persian Proxy Networks among Arab Tribes and Caucasian Powers
SEARCH
DB ONLINE
EN ▾
EN TR
F-16CJ Fighting Falcon
Photo: aceebee from Camberley, UK · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 2.0
REC // INTEL FEED

F-16CJFightingFalcon

Interceptors
ADD TO COMPARE

F-16CJFightingFalcon

F-16CJ Fighting Falcon
F-16CJ Fighting Falcon Photo: aceebee from Camberley, UK · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 2.0
MASS (Military Archive Scoring System) 69
* Absolute score — assessed within category · no era adjustment
Speed
70
Rate of Climb
75
Service Ceiling
70
Radar & Sensors
60
Long-Range Missiles
65
Range
55
Readiness
80
Reliability
78
Technology
65
Cost-Effectiveness
85
Methodology ↗ → Interceptors ranking
ManufacturerSamsung Group, Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics
CategoryInterceptors
⬇ Overview
⚙ Specs
⊕ History
⚖ MASS Score
📚 Sources
Data Quality80%
MASS(Military Archive Scoring System)
⊟ Interceptorsranking ↗methodology ↗
69
Interceptors MASS Rating
30/87
All-Time
Interceptors · 10 axes scored
Speed
70
Rate of Climb
75
Service Ceiling
70
Radar & Sensors
60
Long-Range Missiles
65
Range
55
Readiness
80
Reliability
78
Technology
65
Cost-Effectiveness
85
ⓘ Regardless of era, the same scoring system applies to all units in the interceptors category.
01 / Overview
F-16CJ Fighting Falcon
Category
Interceptors
Prime contractor
Samsung Group, Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics
💰 PERFORMANCE / PRICE ASSESSMENT Methodology ↗
INTERCEPTORS
—
PERFORMANCE/PRICE
90
UNIT COST (2025 USD)
—
MASS SCORE ↗
69
interceptors category
ⓘ Performance/Price and MASS score are computed across all units in the interceptors category, regardless of era.
02 / Specs & Design
03 / History
Interceptors Samsung GroupLockheed MartinGeneral Dynamics
📚 Sources
📖 ENCYCLOPEDIA Browse the Interceptors entry →