LATEST Ancient Prototypes of Proxy Warfare: The Economic and Logistical Burden of Roman and Persian Proxy Networks among Arab Tribes and Caucasian Powers
SEARCH
DB ONLINE
EN ▾
EN TR
F-16CG/DG Fighting Falcon
Photo: Andrew Thomas from Shrewsbury, UK · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 2.0
REC // INTEL FEED

F-16CG/DGFightingFalcon

Interceptors
ADD TO COMPARE

F-16CG/DGFightingFalcon

F-16CG/DG Fighting Falcon
F-16CG/DG Fighting Falcon Photo: Andrew Thomas from Shrewsbury, UK · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 2.0
MASS (Military Archive Scoring System) 83
* Absolute score — assessed within category · no era adjustment
Speed
85
Rate of Climb
80
Service Ceiling
75
Radar & Sensors
85
Long-Range Missiles
80
Range
70
Readiness
90
Reliability
95
Technology
90
Cost-Effectiveness
95
Methodology ↗ → Interceptors ranking
ManufacturerLockheed Martin, General Dynamics
CategoryInterceptors
⬇ Overview
⚙ Specs
⊕ History
⚖ MASS Score
📚 Sources
Data Quality80%
MASS(Military Archive Scoring System)
⊟ Interceptorsranking ↗methodology ↗
83
Interceptors MASS Rating
2/87
All-Time
Interceptors · 10 axes scored
Speed
85
Rate of Climb
80
Service Ceiling
75
Radar & Sensors
85
Long-Range Missiles
80
Range
70
Readiness
90
Reliability
95
Technology
90
Cost-Effectiveness
95
ⓘ Regardless of era, the same scoring system applies to all units in the interceptors category.
01 / Overview
F-16CG/DG Fighting Falcon
Category
Interceptors
Prime contractor
Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics
💰 PERFORMANCE / PRICE ASSESSMENT Methodology ↗
INTERCEPTORS
—
PERFORMANCE/PRICE
97
UNIT COST (2025 USD)
—
MASS SCORE ↗
83
interceptors category
ⓘ Performance/Price and MASS score are computed across all units in the interceptors category, regardless of era.
02 / Specs & Design
03 / History
Interceptors Lockheed MartinGeneral DynamicsTurkish Aerospace Industries
📚 Sources
📖 ENCYCLOPEDIA Browse the Interceptors entry →