LATEST Ancient Prototypes of Proxy Warfare: The Economic and Logistical Burden of Roman and Persian Proxy Networks among Arab Tribes and Caucasian Powers
SEARCH
DB ONLINE
EN ▾
Mk 3 mine
Photo: Oxyman · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY 2.5
REC // INTEL FEED

Mk3mine

Anti-Tank Mines · United Kingdom
ADD TO COMPARE

Mk3mine

Mk 3 mine
Mk 3 mine Photo: Oxyman · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY 2.5
* Absolute score — assessed within category · no era adjustment
Penetration / Lethality
75
Concealment
85
Trigger Versatility
70
Anti-Handling
60
Reliability
90
Detection Resistance
80
Ease of Deployment
95
Full-Width Attack
0
Technology
60
Cost
90
Origin United Kingdom
CategoryAnti-Tank Mines
Operators4 countries
Data Quality85%
MASS(Military Archive Scoring System)
70
Anti-Tank Mines MASS Rating
14/60
All-Time
Anti-Tank Mines · 10 axes scored
Penetration / Lethality
75
Concealment
85
Trigger Versatility
70
Anti-Handling
60
Reliability
90
Detection Resistance
80
Ease of Deployment
95
Full-Width Attack
0
Technology
60
Cost
90
ⓘ Regardless of era, the same scoring system applies to all units in the anti-tank mines category.
01 / Overview
Mk 3 mine
Operators
💰 PERFORMANCE / PRICE ASSESSMENT Methodology ↗
ANTI-TANK MINES
—
PERFORMANCE/PRICE
95
UNIT COST (2025 USD)
—
70
anti-tank mines category
ⓘ Performance/Price and MASS score are computed across all units in the anti-tank mines category, regardless of era.
02 / Specs & Design
◎General5MOD.5
  • Munition TypeAnti-tank mine
  • Service Entry Year1939
  • Weight2.27 kg
  • Diameter152.4 mm
  • In ServiceNo
◈Trigger & Fuzing5MOD.5
▣Effect5MOD.5
◇Deployment4MOD.4
03 / History
04 / Operators
📚 Sources
📖 ENCYCLOPEDIA Browse the Anti-Tank Mines entry →