LATEST Ancient Prototypes of Proxy Warfare: The Economic and Logistical Burden of Roman and Persian Proxy Networks among Arab Tribes and Caucasian Powers
SEARCH
DB ONLINE
EN ▾
EN TR
YaM-10
Photo: sc_yang · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY 2.0
REC // INTEL FEED

YaM-10

Anti-Tank Mines · Russia
ADD TO COMPARE

YaM-10

YaM-10
YaM-10 Photo: sc_yang · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY 2.0
MASS (Military Archive Scoring System) 69
* Absolute score — assessed within category · no era adjustment
Penetration / Lethality
60
Concealment
85
Trigger Versatility
75
Anti-Handling
50
Reliability
80
Detection Resistance
70
Ease of Deployment
90
Full-Width Attack
40
Technology
65
Cost
85
Methodology ↗ → Anti-Tank Mines ranking
Origin Russia
CategoryAnti-Tank Mines
Operators1 countries
⬇ Overview
⚙ Specs
⊕ History
⊕ Operators
⚖ MASS Score
📚 Sources
Data Quality81%
MASS(Military Archive Scoring System)
⊟ Anti-Tank Minesranking ↗methodology ↗
69
Anti-Tank Mines MASS Rating
15/60
All-Time
Anti-Tank Mines · 10 axes scored
Penetration / Lethality
60
Concealment
85
Trigger Versatility
75
Anti-Handling
50
Reliability
80
Detection Resistance
70
Ease of Deployment
90
Full-Width Attack
40
Technology
65
Cost
85
ⓘ Regardless of era, the same scoring system applies to all units in the anti-tank mines category.
01 / Overview
YaM-10
Category
Anti-Tank Mines
Country
Russia
Operators
1 countries
💰 PERFORMANCE / PRICE ASSESSMENT Methodology ↗
ANTI-TANK MINES
—
PERFORMANCE/PRICE
95
UNIT COST (2025 USD)
—
MASS SCORE ↗
69
anti-tank mines category
ⓘ Performance/Price and MASS score are computed across all units in the anti-tank mines category, regardless of era.
02 / Specs & Design
03 / History
04 / Operators
Operator Countries1country
RussiaACTIVE
Anti-Tank Mines Russia
📚 Sources
📖 ENCYCLOPEDIA Browse the Anti-Tank Mines entry →