LATEST Ancient Prototypes of Proxy Warfare: The Economic and Logistical Burden of Roman and Persian Proxy Networks among Arab Tribes and Caucasian Powers
SEARCH
DB ONLINE
EN ▾
EN TR
MR-123
Photo: Atsasebo · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 3.0
REC // INTEL FEED

MR-123

Anti-Tank Mines · Poland
ADD TO COMPARE

MR-123

MR-123
MR-123 Photo: Atsasebo · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 3.0
MASS (Military Archive Scoring System) 55
* Absolute score — assessed within category · no era adjustment
Penetration / Lethality
40
Concealment
70
Trigger Versatility
55
Anti-Handling
30
Reliability
80
Detection Resistance
65
Ease of Deployment
85
Full-Width Attack
20
Technology
50
Cost
75
Methodology ↗ → Anti-Tank Mines ranking
Origin Poland
CategoryAnti-Tank Mines
⬇ Overview
⚙ Specs
⊕ History
⚖ MASS Score
📚 Sources
Data Quality80%
MASS(Military Archive Scoring System)
⊟ Anti-Tank Minesranking ↗methodology ↗
55
Anti-Tank Mines MASS Rating
34/60
All-Time
Anti-Tank Mines · 10 axes scored
Penetration / Lethality
40
Concealment
70
Trigger Versatility
55
Anti-Handling
30
Reliability
80
Detection Resistance
65
Ease of Deployment
85
Full-Width Attack
20
Technology
50
Cost
75
ⓘ Regardless of era, the same scoring system applies to all units in the anti-tank mines category.
01 / Overview
MR-123
Category
Anti-Tank Mines
Country
Poland
💰 PERFORMANCE / PRICE ASSESSMENT Methodology ↗
ANTI-TANK MINES
—
PERFORMANCE/PRICE
95
UNIT COST (2025 USD)
—
MASS SCORE ↗
55
anti-tank mines category
ⓘ Performance/Price and MASS score are computed across all units in the anti-tank mines category, regardless of era.
02 / Specs & Design
03 / History
Anti-Tank Mines Poland
📚 Sources
📖 ENCYCLOPEDIA Browse the Anti-Tank Mines entry →