LATEST Ancient Prototypes of Proxy Warfare: The Economic and Logistical Burden of Roman and Persian Proxy Networks among Arab Tribes and Caucasian Powers
SEARCH
DB ONLINE
EN ▾
REC // INTEL FEED

PT-Mi-D

Anti-Tank Mines
ADD TO COMPARE

PT-Mi-D

* Absolute score — assessed within category · no era adjustment
Penetration / Lethality
30
Concealment
85
Trigger Versatility
50
Anti-Handling
20
Reliability
75
Detection Resistance
80
Ease of Deployment
90
Full-Width Attack
0
Technology
40
Cost
95
CategoryAnti-Tank Mines
Operators10 countries
Data Quality85%
MASS(Military Archive Scoring System)
53
Anti-Tank Mines MASS Rating
36/60
All-Time
Anti-Tank Mines · 10 axes scored
Penetration / Lethality
30
Concealment
85
Trigger Versatility
50
Anti-Handling
20
Reliability
75
Detection Resistance
80
Ease of Deployment
90
Full-Width Attack
0
Technology
40
Cost
95
ⓘ Regardless of era, the same scoring system applies to all units in the anti-tank mines category.
01 / Overview
PT-Mi-D
Operators
💰 PERFORMANCE / PRICE ASSESSMENT Methodology ↗
ANTI-TANK MINES
—
PERFORMANCE/PRICE
95
UNIT COST (2025 USD)
—
53
anti-tank mines category
ⓘ Performance/Price and MASS score are computed across all units in the anti-tank mines category, regardless of era.
02 / Specs & Design
03 / History
04 / Operators
05 / MASS Score
MASS RANKINGSMASS ↗
ⓘ Rankings are within theAnti-Tank Minescategory.
📚 Sources
📖 ENCYCLOPEDIA Browse the Anti-Tank Mines entry →