LATEST Ancient Prototypes of Proxy Warfare: The Economic and Logistical Burden of Roman and Persian Proxy Networks among Arab Tribes and Caucasian Powers
SEARCH
DB ONLINE
EN ▾
AN/TPQ-36 Firefinder radar
Photo: US ARMY · Wikimedia Commons · Public domain Use of this image does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD).
REC // INTEL FEED

AN/TPQ-36Firefinderradar

Counter-Battery Radars
ADD TO COMPARE

AN/TPQ-36Firefinderradar

AN/TPQ-36 Firefinder radar
AN/TPQ-36 Firefinder radar Photo: US ARMY · Wikimedia Commons · Public domain Use of this image does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD).
* Absolute score — assessed within category · no era adjustment
Detection Range
85
Point-of-Origin Accuracy
90
Reaction Time
80
Target Capacity
75
Mobility
70
Coverage
80
Reliability
90
Survivability
75
Technology
85
Cost-Effectiveness
80
ManufacturerNorthrop Grumman Corporation, ThalesRaytheonSystems
CategoryCounter-Battery Radars
Operators13 countries
Data Quality85%
MASS(Military Archive Scoring System)
82
Counter-Battery Radars MASS Rating
1/8
All-Time
Counter-Battery Radars · 10 axes scored
Detection Range
85
Point-of-Origin Accuracy
90
Reaction Time
80
Target Capacity
75
Mobility
70
Coverage
80
Reliability
90
Survivability
75
Technology
85
Cost-Effectiveness
80
ⓘ Regardless of era, the same scoring system applies to all units in the counter-battery radars category.
01 / Overview
AN/TPQ-36 Firefinder radar
💰 PERFORMANCE / PRICE ASSESSMENT Methodology ↗
COUNTER-BATTERY RADARS
—
PERFORMANCE/PRICE
90
UNIT COST (2025 USD)
—
82
counter-battery radars category
ⓘ Performance/Price and MASS score are computed across all units in the counter-battery radars category, regardless of era.
02 / Specs & Design
03 / History
04 / Operators
05 / MASS Score
MASS RANKINGSMASS ↗
ⓘ Rankings are within theCounter-Battery Radarscategory.
📚 Sources
📖 ENCYCLOPEDIA Browse the Counter-Battery Radars entry →