LATEST Ancient Prototypes of Proxy Warfare: The Economic and Logistical Burden of Roman and Persian Proxy Networks among Arab Tribes and Caucasian Powers
SEARCH
DB ONLINE
EN ▾
LST-491-class tank landing ship
Photo: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 4.0
REC // INTEL FEED

LST-491-classtanklandingship

Landing Ship Tank (LST) · United States · 1943
ADD TO COMPARE

LST-491-classtanklandingship

LST-491-class tank landing ship
LST-491-class tank landing ship Photo: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 4.0
* Absolute score — assessed within category · no era adjustment
Beaching Capability
70
Vehicle / Cargo Capacity
75
Range
65
Self-Defence
40
Reliability
80
Versatility
78
Survivability
55
Sea-Keeping
50
Technology
60
Cost-Effectiveness
85
Origin United States
ManufacturerChicago Bridge & Iron Company, Jeffboat, Missouri Valley Bridge & Iron Co.
CategoryLanding Ship Tank (LST)
EraWorld War II
In service1943
Operators6 countries
Data Quality88%
MASS(Military Archive Scoring System)
67
Landing Ship Tank (LST) MASS Rating
12/14
World War II
24/46
All-Time
Landing Ship Tank (LST) · 10 axes scored
Beaching Capability
70
Vehicle / Cargo Capacity
75
Range
65
Self-Defence
40
Reliability
80
Versatility
78
Survivability
55
Sea-Keeping
50
Technology
60
Cost-Effectiveness
85
ⓘ Regardless of era, the same scoring system applies to all units in the landing ship tank (lst) category.
01 / Overview
LST-491-class tank landing ship
💰 PERFORMANCE / PRICE ASSESSMENT Methodology ↗
LANDING SHIP TANK (LST) · WORLD WAR II
12
PERFORMANCE/PRICE
94
UNIT COST (2025 USD)
—
67
landing ship tank (lst) category
ⓘ Performance/Price and MASS score are computed across all units in the landing ship tank (lst) category, regardless of era.
02 / Specs & Design
03 / History
SERVICE LIFESPANStill in Service
  1. 1943Production started
83
years in service
6
countries operating
ⓘ The producing country still actively operates it.
04 / Operators
📚 Sources
📖 ENCYCLOPEDIA Browse the Landing Ship Tank (LST) entry →