LATEST Ancient Prototypes of Proxy Warfare: The Economic and Logistical Burden of Roman and Persian Proxy Networks among Arab Tribes and Caucasian Powers
SEARCH
DB ONLINE
EN ▾
EN TR
Model 1906
Photo: Rama · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 2.0 fr
REC // INTEL FEED

Model1906

Naval Mines · Russia
ADD TO COMPARE

Model1906

⚙ Model 1898 variant
Model 1906
Model 1906 Photo: Rama · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 2.0 fr
MASS (Military Archive Scoring System) 27
* Absolute score — assessed within category · no era adjustment
Lethality
30
Concealment
25
Target Discrimination
10
Trigger Sophistication
15
Anti-Sweep Capability
20
Reliability
35
Deployment Versatility
40
Dormancy Endurance
45
Technology
20
Cost-Effectiveness
55
Methodology ↗ → Naval Mines ranking
Origin Russia
ManufacturerRussian Empire
CategoryNaval Mines
⬇ Overview
⚙ Specs
⊕ History
⚖ MASS Score
📚 Sources
Data Quality80%
MASS(Military Archive Scoring System)
⊟ Naval Minesranking ↗methodology ↗
27
Naval Mines MASS Rating
36/39
All-Time
Naval Mines · 10 axes scored
Lethality
30
Concealment
25
Target Discrimination
10
Trigger Sophistication
15
Anti-Sweep Capability
20
Reliability
35
Deployment Versatility
40
Dormancy Endurance
45
Technology
20
Cost-Effectiveness
55
ⓘ Regardless of era, the same scoring system applies to all units in the naval mines category.
01 / Overview
Model 1906
Category
Naval Mines
Country
Russia
Prime contractor
Russian Empire
💰 PERFORMANCE / PRICE ASSESSMENT Methodology ↗
NAVAL MINES
—
PERFORMANCE/PRICE
78
UNIT COST (2025 USD)
—
MASS SCORE ↗
27
naval mines category
ⓘ Performance/Price and MASS score are computed across all units in the naval mines category, regardless of era.
02 / Specs & Design
03 / History
Naval Mines Russia Russian Empire variant
📚 Sources
📖 ENCYCLOPEDIA Browse the Naval Mines entry →