Photo: photographer not identified · Wikimedia Commons · Public domain

REC // INTEL FEED

Model1916

Naval Mines · 1916

ADD TO COMPARE

Model1916

Model 1916 Photo: photographer not identified · Wikimedia Commons · Public domain

MASS (Military Archive Scoring System) 54

* Absolute score — assessed within category · no era adjustment

Lethality

Concealment

Target Discrimination

Trigger Sophistication

Anti-Sweep Capability

Reliability

Deployment Versatility

Dormancy Endurance

Technology

Cost-Effectiveness

Methodology ↗ → Naval Mines ranking

CategoryNaval Mines

EraWorld War I

In service1916

⊕ History

Data Quality83%

MASS(Military Archive Scoring System)

⊟ Naval Minesranking ↗methodology ↗

Naval Mines MASS Rating

1/2

World War I

31/39

All-Time

Naval Mines · 10 axes scored

Lethality

Concealment

Target Discrimination

Trigger Sophistication

Anti-Sweep Capability

Reliability

Deployment Versatility

Dormancy Endurance

Technology

Cost-Effectiveness

ⓘ Regardless of era, the same scoring system applies to all units in the naval mines category.

01 / Overview

Model 1916

Category

Naval Mines

Production

1916–

💰 PERFORMANCE / PRICE ASSESSMENT Methodology ↗

NAVAL MINES · WORLD WAR I

PERFORMANCE/PRICE

UNIT COST (2025 USD)

—

MASS SCORE ↗

naval mines category

ⓘ Performance/Price and MASS score are computed across all units in the naval mines category, regardless of era.

02 / Specs & Design

03 / History

SERVICE LIFESPANRetired

1916Production started

110

years in service

04 / MASS Score

NAVAL MINES RANKING Naval Mines · World War I

#29

EhP 59 #30

AGSB 59 #31 Model 1916 (this weapon) 54 #32

Model 1898 50 #33

R-1 41

MASS RANKINGSMASS ↗

31NAVAL MINES 1WORLD WAR I · NAVAL MINES 15PERFORMANCE/PRICE · NAVAL MINES

ⓘ Rankings are within theNaval Minescategory.

Naval Mines World War I

📚 Sources

📖 ENCYCLOPEDIA Browse the Naval Mines entry →