LATEST Ancient Prototypes of Proxy Warfare: The Economic and Logistical Burden of Roman and Persian Proxy Networks among Arab Tribes and Caucasian Powers
SEARCH
DB ONLINE
EN ▾
EN TR
Model 1908
Photo: Milesnfowler · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 3.0
REC // INTEL FEED

Model1908

Naval Mines · Russia
ADD TO COMPARE

Model1908

Model 1908
Model 1908 Photo: Milesnfowler · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 3.0
MASS (Military Archive Scoring System) 31
* Absolute score — assessed within category · no era adjustment
Lethality
30
Concealment
40
Target Discrimination
10
Trigger Sophistication
5
Anti-Sweep Capability
15
Reliability
60
Deployment Versatility
35
Dormancy Endurance
45
Technology
20
Cost-Effectiveness
80
Methodology ↗ → Naval Mines ranking
Origin Russia
CategoryNaval Mines
⬇ Overview
⚙ Specs
⊕ History
⚖ MASS Score
📚 Sources
Data Quality80%
MASS(Military Archive Scoring System)
⊟ Naval Minesranking ↗methodology ↗
31
Naval Mines MASS Rating
35/39
All-Time
Naval Mines · 10 axes scored
Lethality
30
Concealment
40
Target Discrimination
10
Trigger Sophistication
5
Anti-Sweep Capability
15
Reliability
60
Deployment Versatility
35
Dormancy Endurance
45
Technology
20
Cost-Effectiveness
80
ⓘ Regardless of era, the same scoring system applies to all units in the naval mines category.
01 / Overview
Model 1908
Category
Naval Mines
Country
Russia
💰 PERFORMANCE / PRICE ASSESSMENT Methodology ↗
NAVAL MINES
—
PERFORMANCE/PRICE
32
UNIT COST (2025 USD)
—
MASS SCORE ↗
31
naval mines category
ⓘ Performance/Price and MASS score are computed across all units in the naval mines category, regardless of era.
02 / Specs & Design
03 / History
Naval Mines Russia
📚 Sources
📖 ENCYCLOPEDIA Browse the Naval Mines entry →