LATEST Ancient Prototypes of Proxy Warfare: The Economic and Logistical Burden of Roman and Persian Proxy Networks among Arab Tribes and Caucasian Powers
SEARCH
DB ONLINE
EN ▾
EN TR
Model 1908/39
Photo: Greg Gjerdingen from Willmar, USA · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY 2.0
REC // INTEL FEED

Model1908/39

Naval Mines · Russia · 1939
ADD TO COMPARE

Model1908/39

⚙ Model 1908 variant
Model 1908/39
Model 1908/39 Photo: Greg Gjerdingen from Willmar, USA · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY 2.0
MASS (Military Archive Scoring System) 61
* Absolute score — assessed within category · no era adjustment
Lethality
68
Concealment
55
Target Discrimination
30
Trigger Sophistication
60
Anti-Sweep Capability
58
Reliability
72
Deployment Versatility
65
Dormancy Endurance
70
Technology
62
Cost-Effectiveness
80
Methodology ↗ → Naval Mines ranking
Origin Russia
CategoryNaval Mines
EraWorld War II
In service1939
⬇ Overview
⚙ Specs
⊕ History
⚖ MASS Score
📚 Sources
Data Quality83%
MASS(Military Archive Scoring System)
⊟ Naval Minesranking ↗methodology ↗
61
Naval Mines MASS Rating
13/17
World War II
26/39
All-Time
Naval Mines · 10 axes scored
Lethality
68
Concealment
55
Target Discrimination
30
Trigger Sophistication
60
Anti-Sweep Capability
58
Reliability
72
Deployment Versatility
65
Dormancy Endurance
70
Technology
62
Cost-Effectiveness
80
ⓘ Regardless of era, the same scoring system applies to all units in the naval mines category.
01 / Overview
Model 1908/39
Category
Naval Mines
Country
Russia
Production
1939–
💰 PERFORMANCE / PRICE ASSESSMENT Methodology ↗
NAVAL MINES · WORLD WAR II
13
PERFORMANCE/PRICE
94
UNIT COST (2025 USD)
—
MASS SCORE ↗
61
naval mines category
ⓘ Performance/Price and MASS score are computed across all units in the naval mines category, regardless of era.
02 / Specs & Design
03 / History
SERVICE LIFESPANRetired
  1. 1939Production started
87
years in service
Naval Mines World War II Russia variant
📚 Sources
📖 ENCYCLOPEDIA Browse the Naval Mines entry →