LATEST Ancient Prototypes of Proxy Warfare: The Economic and Logistical Burden of Roman and Persian Proxy Networks among Arab Tribes and Caucasian Powers
SEARCH
DB ONLINE
EN ▾
EN TR
MMD-2
Photo: DAN MOI - World Music Instruments · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 2.0
REC // INTEL FEED

MMD-2

Naval Mines · Poland
ADD TO COMPARE

MMD-2

MMD-2
MMD-2 Photo: DAN MOI - World Music Instruments · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 2.0
MASS (Military Archive Scoring System) 72
* Absolute score — assessed within category · no era adjustment
Lethality
78
Concealment
70
Target Discrimination
55
Trigger Sophistication
73
Anti-Sweep Capability
68
Reliability
80
Deployment Versatility
65
Dormancy Endurance
85
Technology
70
Cost-Effectiveness
75
Methodology ↗ → Naval Mines ranking
Origin Poland
CategoryNaval Mines
Operators1 countries
⬇ Overview
⚙ Specs
⊕ History
⊕ Operators
⚖ MASS Score
📚 Sources
Data Quality81%
MASS(Military Archive Scoring System)
⊟ Naval Minesranking ↗methodology ↗
72
Naval Mines MASS Rating
8/39
All-Time
Naval Mines · 10 axes scored
Lethality
78
Concealment
70
Target Discrimination
55
Trigger Sophistication
73
Anti-Sweep Capability
68
Reliability
80
Deployment Versatility
65
Dormancy Endurance
85
Technology
70
Cost-Effectiveness
75
ⓘ Regardless of era, the same scoring system applies to all units in the naval mines category.
01 / Overview
MMD-2
Category
Naval Mines
Country
Poland
Operators
1 countries
💰 PERFORMANCE / PRICE ASSESSMENT Methodology ↗
NAVAL MINES
—
PERFORMANCE/PRICE
44
UNIT COST (2025 USD)
—
MASS SCORE ↗
72
naval mines category
ⓘ Performance/Price and MASS score are computed across all units in the naval mines category, regardless of era.
02 / Specs & Design
03 / History
04 / Operators
Operator Countries1country
VietnamACTIVE
Naval Mines Poland
📚 Sources
📖 ENCYCLOPEDIA Browse the Naval Mines entry →