LATEST Ancient Prototypes of Proxy Warfare: The Economic and Logistical Burden of Roman and Persian Proxy Networks among Arab Tribes and Caucasian Powers
SEARCH
DB ONLINE
EN ▾
EN TR
AMG-1
Photo: Meodipt at English Wikipedia · Wikimedia Commons · Public domain
REC // INTEL FEED

AMG-1

Naval Mines · Russia · 1939
ADD TO COMPARE

AMG-1

⚙ Model 1912 variant
AMG-1
AMG-1 Photo: Meodipt at English Wikipedia · Wikimedia Commons · Public domain
MASS (Military Archive Scoring System) 63
* Absolute score — assessed within category · no era adjustment
Lethality
75
Concealment
60
Target Discrimination
40
Trigger Sophistication
50
Anti-Sweep Capability
55
Reliability
70
Deployment Versatility
65
Dormancy Endurance
80
Technology
50
Cost-Effectiveness
85
Methodology ↗ → Naval Mines ranking
Origin Russia
CategoryNaval Mines
EraWorld War II
In service1939
⬇ Overview
⚙ Specs
⊕ History
⚖ MASS Score
📚 Sources
Data Quality84%
MASS(Military Archive Scoring System)
⊟ Naval Minesranking ↗methodology ↗
63
Naval Mines MASS Rating
11/17
World War II
24/39
All-Time
Naval Mines · 10 axes scored
Lethality
75
Concealment
60
Target Discrimination
40
Trigger Sophistication
50
Anti-Sweep Capability
55
Reliability
70
Deployment Versatility
65
Dormancy Endurance
80
Technology
50
Cost-Effectiveness
85
ⓘ Regardless of era, the same scoring system applies to all units in the naval mines category.
01 / Overview
AMG-1
Category
Naval Mines
Country
Russia
Production
1939–
💰 PERFORMANCE / PRICE ASSESSMENT Methodology ↗
NAVAL MINES · WORLD WAR II
11
PERFORMANCE/PRICE
87
UNIT COST (2025 USD)
—
MASS SCORE ↗
63
naval mines category
ⓘ Performance/Price and MASS score are computed across all units in the naval mines category, regardless of era.
02 / Specs & Design
03 / History
SERVICE LIFESPANRetired
  1. 1939Production started
87
years in service
Naval Mines World War II Russia variant
📚 Sources
📖 ENCYCLOPEDIA Browse the Naval Mines entry →