LATEST Ancient Prototypes of Proxy Warfare: The Economic and Logistical Burden of Roman and Persian Proxy Networks among Arab Tribes and Caucasian Powers
SEARCH
DB ONLINE
EN ▾
XM701
Photo: U.S. Army · Wikimedia Commons · Public domain Use of this image does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD).
REC // INTEL FEED

XM701

Infantry Fighting Vehicles (IFV)
ADD TO COMPARE

XM701

XM701
XM701 Photo: U.S. Army · Wikimedia Commons · Public domain Use of this image does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD).
* Absolute score — assessed within category · no era adjustment
Firepower
60
Protection
55
Mobility
65
Troop Capacity
50
Anti-Armour Capability
55
Situational Awareness
45
Survivability
50
Amphibious Capability
40
Technology
60
Cost-Effectiveness
45
ManufacturerPACCAR
CategoryInfantry Fighting Vehicles (IFV)
Operators3 countries
Data Quality83%
54
Infantry Fighting Vehicles (IFV) MASS Rating
50/83
All-Time
Infantry Fighting Vehicles (IFV) · 10 axes scored
Firepower
60
Protection
55
Mobility
65
Troop Capacity
50
Anti-Armour Capability
55
Situational Awareness
45
Survivability
50
Amphibious Capability
40
Technology
60
Cost-Effectiveness
45
ⓘ Regardless of era, the same scoring system applies to all units in the infantry fighting vehicles (ifv) category.
01 / Overview
XM701
Prime contractor
Operators
💰 PERFORMANCE / PRICE ASSESSMENT Methodology ↗
INFANTRY FIGHTING VEHICLES (IFV)
—
PERFORMANCE/PRICE
40
UNIT COST (2025 USD)
—
54
infantry fighting vehicles (ifv) category
ⓘ Performance/Price and MASS score are computed across all units in the infantry fighting vehicles (ifv) category, regardless of era.
02 / Specs & Design
03 / History
04 / Operators
05 / MASS Score
MASS RANKINGSMASS ↗
ⓘ Rankings are within theInfantry Fighting Vehicles (IFV)category.
📚 Sources
📖 ENCYCLOPEDIA Browse the Infantry Fighting Vehicles (IFV) entry →