LATEST Ancient Prototypes of Proxy Warfare: The Economic and Logistical Burden of Roman and Persian Proxy Networks among Arab Tribes and Caucasian Powers
SEARCH
DB ONLINE
EN ▾
EN TR
REC // INTEL FEED

ElbitSystemsReDrone

Counter-Drone Systems (C-UAS)
ADD TO COMPARE

ElbitSystemsReDrone

MASS (Military Archive Scoring System) 61
* Absolute score — assessed within category · no era adjustment
Detection Range
55
Defeat Effectiveness
60
Reaction Time
70
Multi-Target Capability
45
Coverage
50
Non-Kinetic Options
60
Mobility
80
Technology
65
Versatility
60
Cost-Effectiveness
75
Methodology ↗ → Counter-Drone Systems (C-UAS) ranking
CategoryCounter-Drone Systems (C-UAS)
⬇ Overview
⚙ Specs
⊕ History
⚖ MASS Score
📚 Sources
Data Quality80%
MASS(Military Archive Scoring System)
⊟ Counter-Drone Systems (C-UAS)ranking ↗methodology ↗
61
Counter-Drone Systems (C-UAS) MASS Rating
89/105
All-Time
Counter-Drone Systems (C-UAS) · 10 axes scored
Detection Range
55
Defeat Effectiveness
60
Reaction Time
70
Multi-Target Capability
45
Coverage
50
Non-Kinetic Options
60
Mobility
80
Technology
65
Versatility
60
Cost-Effectiveness
75
ⓘ Regardless of era, the same scoring system applies to all units in the counter-drone systems (c-uas) category.
01 / Overview
Elbit Systems ReDrone
Category
Counter-Drone Systems (C-UAS)
💰 PERFORMANCE / PRICE ASSESSMENT Methodology ↗
COUNTER-DRONE SYSTEMS (C-UAS)
—
PERFORMANCE/PRICE
78
UNIT COST (2025 USD)
—
MASS SCORE ↗
61
counter-drone systems (c-uas) category
ⓘ Performance/Price and MASS score are computed across all units in the counter-drone systems (c-uas) category, regardless of era.
02 / Specs & Design
03 / History
Counter-Drone Systems (C-UAS) Elbit Systems Ltd.
📚 Sources
📖 ENCYCLOPEDIA Browse the Counter-Drone Systems (C-UAS) entry →