LATEST Ancient Prototypes of Proxy Warfare: The Economic and Logistical Burden of Roman and Persian Proxy Networks among Arab Tribes and Caucasian Powers
SEARCH
DB ONLINE
EN ▾
Curtiss-Wright R5C-1 Commando
Photo: Tomás Del Coro from Las Vegas, Nevada, USA · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 2.0
REC // INTEL FEED

Curtiss-WrightR5C-1Commando

Tactical Transports
ADD TO COMPARE

Curtiss-WrightR5C-1Commando

⚙ C-46A Commando variant
Curtiss-Wright R5C-1 Commando
Curtiss-Wright R5C-1 Commando Photo: Tomás Del Coro from Las Vegas, Nevada, USA · Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 2.0
* Absolute score — assessed within category · no era adjustment
Payload
75
Short / Rough-Field Capability
70
Range
65
Cargo Versatility
80
Reliability
70
Self-Protection
30
Low-Altitude Capability
60
Versatility
85
Technology
50
Cost-Effectiveness
80
ManufacturerCurtiss-Wright, Curtiss
CategoryTactical Transports
Operators1 countries
Data Quality81%
MASS(Military Archive Scoring System)
68
Tactical Transports MASS Rating
62/215
All-Time
Tactical Transports · 10 axes scored
Payload
75
Short / Rough-Field Capability
70
Range
65
Cargo Versatility
80
Reliability
70
Self-Protection
30
Low-Altitude Capability
60
Versatility
85
Technology
50
Cost-Effectiveness
80
ⓘ Regardless of era, the same scoring system applies to all units in the tactical transports category.
01 / Overview
Curtiss-Wright R5C-1 Commando
Prime contractor
Operators
💰 PERFORMANCE / PRICE ASSESSMENT Methodology ↗
TACTICAL TRANSPORTS
—
PERFORMANCE/PRICE
85
UNIT COST (2025 USD)
—
68
tactical transports category
ⓘ Performance/Price and MASS score are computed across all units in the tactical transports category, regardless of era.
02 / Specs & Design
03 / History
04 / Operators
Operator Countries1country
📚 Sources
📖 ENCYCLOPEDIA Browse the Tactical Transports entry →