LATEST Ancient Prototypes of Proxy Warfare: The Economic and Logistical Burden of Roman and Persian Proxy Networks among Arab Tribes and Caucasian Powers
SEARCH
DB ONLINE
EN ▾
Gulfstream C-37
Photo: U.S. Navy photo by Paul Farley. (RELEASED) · Wikimedia Commons · Public domain Use of this image does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD).
REC // INTEL FEED

GulfstreamC-37

Tactical Transports
ADD TO COMPARE

GulfstreamC-37

Gulfstream C-37
Gulfstream C-37 Photo: U.S. Navy photo by Paul Farley. (RELEASED) · Wikimedia Commons · Public domain Use of this image does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD).
* Absolute score — assessed within category · no era adjustment
Payload
75
Short / Rough-Field Capability
40
Range
80
Cargo Versatility
60
Reliability
85
Self-Protection
30
Low-Altitude Capability
65
Versatility
70
Technology
80
Cost-Effectiveness
70
ManufacturerGulfstream Aerospace
CategoryTactical Transports
Data Quality80%
MASS(Military Archive Scoring System)
65
Tactical Transports MASS Rating
92/215
All-Time
Tactical Transports · 10 axes scored
Payload
75
Short / Rough-Field Capability
40
Range
80
Cargo Versatility
60
Reliability
85
Self-Protection
30
Low-Altitude Capability
65
Versatility
70
Technology
80
Cost-Effectiveness
70
ⓘ Regardless of era, the same scoring system applies to all units in the tactical transports category.
01 / Overview
Gulfstream C-37
Prime contractor
💰 PERFORMANCE / PRICE ASSESSMENT Methodology ↗
TACTICAL TRANSPORTS
—
PERFORMANCE/PRICE
75
UNIT COST (2025 USD)
—
65
tactical transports category
ⓘ Performance/Price and MASS score are computed across all units in the tactical transports category, regardless of era.
02 / Specs & Design
03 / History
04 / MASS Score
MASS RANKINGSMASS ↗
ⓘ Rankings are within theTactical Transportscategory.
📚 Sources
📖 ENCYCLOPEDIA Browse the Tactical Transports entry →